Monday, April 23, 2012

A Considerable Speck (a poem about a microscopic animal)

 A Considerable Speck
(A Poem About a Microscopic Animal)

A speck that would have been beneath my sight
On any but a paper sheet so white
Set off across what I had written there.
And I had idly poised my pen in air
To stop it with a period of ink
When something strange about it made me think,
This was no dust speck by my breathing blown,
But unmistakably a living mite
With inclinations it could call its own.
It paused as with suspicion of my pen,
And then came racing wildly on again
To where my manuscript was not yet dry;
Then paused again and either drank or smelt--
With loathing, for again it turned to fly.
Plainly with an intelligence I dealt.
It seemed too tiny to have room for feet,
Yet must have had a set of them complete
To express how much it didn't want to die.
It ran with terror and with cunning crept.
It faltered: I could see it hesitate;
Then in the middle of the open sheet
Cower down in desperation to accept
Whatever I accorded it of fate.
I have none of the tenderer-than-thou
Collectivistic regimenting love
With which the modern world is being swept.
But this poor microscopic item now!
Since it was nothing I knew evil of
I let it lie there till I hope it slept.

I have a mind myself and recognize
Mind when I meet with it in any guise
No one can know how glad I am to find
On any sheet the least display of mind.

- Robert Frost

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Twelve o'clock

Mother, I do want to leave off my lessons now. I have been at my
book all the morning.
You say it is only twelve o'clock. Suppose it isn't any later;
can't you ever think it is afternoon when it is only twelve
o'clock?
I can easily imagine now that the sun has reached the edge of
that rice-field, and the old fisher-woman is gathering herbs for
her supper by the side of the pond.
I can just shut my eyes and think that the shadows are growing
darker under the madar tree, and the water in the pond looks shiny
black.
If twelve o'clock can come in the night, why can't the night
come when it is twelve o'clock? 


- Rabindranath Tagore

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Money is God?

So is there a god? Can god’s existence be proven without faith/trust? Is it something we can see? Where does it live? Islam claims that god is everywhere. And it is in everything.

Is there a 100 rupee somewhere? Does it exist without faith/trust? Or can it can take the form of 10 Five Stars or 10 dosas or 20 plates of chura mutter or a bag of sand or 5 bottles of mineral water 10 rides in a Vikram to the Cantt. railway station! So it seems like money is inside everything? Is it everywhere as well? Most likely.

If god and money are both in everything and are everywhere, it seems like money and god must co-exist.

Is it possible then that money is our all knowing, all-powerful god, that we pray to in the form of Hanuman ji and/or Allah and/or Jesus Christ and/or just Ishwar/God?

Let me make sure you understand me clearly. I am not against religion. But I like to be critical without feeling guilty or bad.

I think there is something in human beings, a creative spirit. They have to create things. Gods, cartoons, religions, religious practices, songs, grains, clothes, paper, etc. They just can’t stop. If they cannot create, manufacture, and trade, they get bored and then they start wars.

It is not a coincidence that before both the world wars, there was very widespread unemployment and poverty. In fact many wars in our world are around poverty and unemployment. Of course many greedy and rich people wanted war to increase their business. Religious and nationalistic Germans wanted to kill all the Jews. Rational and profit seeking American companies helped kill Jewish people faster and more efficiently using science of computers.

The world war used the best of scientific thinking: the power inside the invisible atoms to create nuclear weapons, which were used to kill humans in large numbers.

Religion, logic, greed, money, science, god, wars, trade, business and employment!

It is all very mixed up. Nothing is neat and tidy as the world of logic of syllogism.

Here is a question for you:

What is smart and what is good? Are these both the same thing? Read the story below and tell me if you think this story is logical and true. What is wrong with this story? Where can the story be changed if it were describing you?

We love to dress well. We need nice clothes to dress well. These nice clothes will be unaffordable if they were expensive.

They are cheap because some really poor people in Vietnam and China make them for very low costs.

If the world thinks that working for low costs is bad for the poor people of Vietnam, the companies will not be able to make the clothes for that low cost. As soon as they increase the pay of the poor, the cost of the clothes increase and then these companies cannot make the same amount of profit as another company which is still paying low wages to their labours.

So the “good” company will become non-profitable and soon close down. In the end only bad companies will remain.

Does God Exist?

It is very clear that the Renaissance was a rebirth of scientific thinking.

What is the opposite of scientific thinking?

Religious dogma, blind faith, believing without arguing or debating, lack of critical thinking or any reasoning which is not based on real cause and effect can be called unscientific.

Not surprisingly many of the scientists and artists of the Renaissance challenged the existence of God, of heaven and hell, all the things that people had “trust” in without actually asking for proof or logic.

Of course many other scientists and artists were very religious in their “faith” and argued that Faith is a different thing than Science.

I was reading a book of logic when I came across this proof that God does not exist:

Is god indestructible (cannot die cannot be destroyed)?

Yes

Is god omnipotent (can do anything and everything) and omniscient (knows everything)?

Yes

Can god make a stone strong enough that it can destroy god?

Ummm.

Wait. So either (a) God is not omnipotent and omniscient (since God cannot make a stone that can destroy God) OR (b) God is destructible, since the stone that god created can destroy god.

God cannot be both those things. Since our faith in god is based on god having both the qualities, god doesn’t exist (at least as we think of it).

Simple and neat!

Religious scholars counter-argue like this:

God created you.

God gave you a mind and health.

God gave you the faculty to think: your logic.

God limited your logic that you cannot understand god with logic, you need something bigger and grander than logic: Faith.

So logic cannot prove existence of god but with faith one can see it.

Syllogism and Logic

Now consider the following paragraphs where I prove that Harshit is very smart ;)

As I said in the last post, anyone who is smart enough will be able to figure out why cheating is bad. Now, Harshit has figured out that cheating is bad. So, Harshit is a smart person.

I use a logical sequence of sentences:

Sentence 1: Anyone who is smart enough can understand how cheating is bad

Sentence 2: Harshit has figured out that cheating is bad for the society

Now I put those two sentences together to make a conclusion

Conclusion: Harshit must be smart!

This kind of logic is called as Syllogism: a kind of logic in which we assume the above two sentences are the only and complete truths in the world and we make conclusion.

In such logic, the fact that Harshit cannot pronounce the word “supercallifragilisticexpialidocious,” does not make him not smart!

About Rationalism

Have you ever felt this way about someone else: this person is so stupid, why cannot they see their own benefit?

Like a person throwing Garbage right outside his house. We know that the wind will slowly blow it back in. They will probably have to deal with the flies and mosquitoes they are breeding with their own garbage etc.

Why can’t they see it?

One day I was trying to buy some pakoras from a small shop owner who was making fresh pakoras. He was selling the pakoras in “plates” of 50 grams. I told him that I want to buy 250 grams to take away. He got really annoyed.

He said, “Why don’t you buy 5 plates of 50 grams instead?”

I demanded that I get a 250 gram pack.

I thought, “This guy is so stupid. I am giving him a business he will get from 5 people here, but he is so insistent on annoying me.”

Then I noticed that he had to change his weights from the stones or whatever he was using for “50 grams” to actual government issued weights of 250 grams.

Aha! So he was annoyed because he actually makes a loss on my deal. You see his stone “50 grams” must have been much less than actual 50 grams. When I demanded one big pack of 250 he had to use the real 250, which in his “50 gram” packets could have made maybe 6 packets! That cunning rat!

Instead of feeling smart that I figured this out, I actually felt a little dumb for thinking that I was “the smart” person. This guy is as smart as he needs to be to make profits.

Of course if the shopkeeper was actually smart enough he would have figured out that cheating is bad. If a society gets corrupt it goes in cycles and such a cycle is difficult to break. Say the shopkeeper cheats and people know that he is cheating, but feel like they cannot do anything about it. So any chance they get, they will cheat him back. And soon many of his customers or suppliers will be cheating him. He will feel worse for being cheated and keep on cheating more. If everyone acts like this, soon the whole society will lose “trust” in each other. It’s the same trust that makes a piece of paper with the RBI governor’s signature on it a 100 rupee note.

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Money

Hello me hearties,

It is a strange thing, money. A few songs, lot of movies, and all together too many TV series show money as the root of all evil.

I was reading one day in the newspaper that there was a small group of students who robbed a bank. They were safely anonymous; no one knew who they were, until one of them started spending too much money. A boy started lighting his cigarettes with 100 rupee notes. That is how they got caught.

When I read this news I was only in class 8 or 9. I had never thought seriously about money, of course, but this incident made me think. If I were to burn a piece of paper, why would anyone think anything? People burn paper all the time!

Then why was money so precious? I asked a few friends, what decides the value of money? One of my friends proposed a theory, which almost made sense. He said that the line in the note, which is generally invisible, but appears against the light, is made or gold or silver.

I would have spend my life thinking that, if it was not for a boy who was naughty and well, rich enough I guess, to tear a bit off a10 rupee note to show the whole group that it was only a white thread. I was left wondering again.

I like Jim Carey films. ‘Dumb and Dumber’ is one of my favourites. I laughed a lot at the end when the police takes the bag, which is supposed to be full of notes, from the two idiotic friends and opens it to find it full of pieces paper on which they have written IOU.

I found it funny, but never got the joke actually. One day I overhear someone use the IOU again. I asked them what it meant. IOU is a short form of "I owe you"; it’s like a promise.

Hmmm. I had read on notes many times the governor announcing to "pay the bearer the sum of 100 rupees" or 50 or 10, and I had often wondered, why will he pay someone who already has the 100 rupee note.

In year 1990s when I was in class 10 or so, my father was watching TV. I saw the news that in Afghanistan the people were carrying sacks and carts full of money to buy very small amounts of food. I was very surprised. I asked my father, what the problem was. He of course did not know very surely himself, but just like an adult, he restated the facts and expected me to understand and be quite.

He said: the value of money has fallen, people don't have enough to eat, government has fallen, and a few random sentences like that.

Later I saw the same news in Hindi, and the newsreader mentioned that people have lost all faith in the government and that government was printing too much money.

Now it kind of fitted together. I made the following connections as a child:

1. Paper money has no value.

2. Paper money is like a promise, sometimes also called a promissory note.

3. What makes people believe in the promise is the amount of money there is. If a government prints more money, things go costly.

When I was in college there was something, which was called as the Asian Financial Crisis, in the countries like Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, South Korea, etc. Money was too much and things were getting expensive. I, of course, did not understand too much even if I was in college then. I must say it is human nature that if they have many things to explore, they choose to explore the areas where they have some faith in achieving success. I was interested in biology and physics. I knew this was not study of animals or of physical phenomena of the world like gravity.

My sister was studying economics. She was studying why people produce things, sell thing, what is money and all that stuff. I am studying it now, when I am 27. Now I am not too bad at it. I got an A on the last economics exam ;).

I asked my sister what was money and she told me a nice story, just as she must have learnt from her teacher. She asked me to imagine old times, very very very old times. Earth was a ball of fire, which had separated from the sun (ahem, that would be physics, see because there are no humans in it yet!).

So the ball of fire cooled down in say about a billion years, and then some basic bacteria and all started forming. No humans still, but life, so we are talking biology. Evolution of life. Then some more biology and evolution and there was human beings, of some kind. Australopithecus, Java man, Neanderthal. Study of how humans lived then.

Then these humans started making groups; some would grow things, others would hunt. Now we have division of work. Stronger people hunt. Children are taken care of. People settle down, they start farming land, cutting down forests. It was good for humans to cut down forest then, since there was only forest all around.

Now there were some people with atta (flour): farmers, and there were people who had meat: hunters. There were other people who would collect and sell coal. Other people who would make metal objects, that hunter or farmer might need.

How did they all get all they needed for living? By bartering. I will give you grain, you give me metal. Here is metal, give me meat. Etc., etc.

While it was simple within a small group it must have been complicated on a larger scale. Imagine in those times if you went from one tribe to the other, each must have had a different barter rate. Trading must have been difficult. And since one tribe that lives near sea has fish but not much metal, and other which has metal but needs colour from the shells, may have to trade with each other, the barter system must have caused lot of confusion and distrust.

And of course there must have been the issue of quality. For example if I buy myself a wife from a man with 3 daughters, (buying wives or slaves was not so uncommon in history) in exchange of a donkey who was stronger than the daughter, can carry more weight and eats less. But then the donkey may turn out blind and the father may get angry. There were family feuds because of such trades for many generations.

When people started conquering large areas and kingdoms appeared, to solve the issue of mistrust and to make more things available for more people from all over their large kingdoms, kings started a way of money exchange. Many civilisations had money like shells of snails, seeds. In one place called Yeo there were people foolish enough to use unmovable large stones, which sat outside the village, as currency.

In China as early as the 14th century ... I mean 1300. You know this, right – when you say 1306, it is in 14th century? Since 0 - 99 is first century. 101- 199 is second century etc.

Going back to China...

So in 14th century china, a king actually made paper money with the seal of the king. But it failed simply because it was too easy to counterfeit, make jali note. They had to replace it with silver and gold coins.

Precious stones and shells and all had intrinsic value. They were precious themselves. And there was only a very, very small amount in the world. Only a little bit of gold and silver could be mined in one year. Kings also had monopoly over digging of gold and silver in many kingdoms.

Think about this (and write your thoughts to me): what is wrong with counterfeit money? If everyone could print a little money for herself and be rich, wouldn’t it be nice? If I am rich, I will give it to poor people, like sabzi walas and all. Why is it bad?

Another one: do you think Yeo people were actually not so dumb in using boulders? Think of a few advantages of using heavy unmovable boulders for currency.

One more: ask someone who has lived both in India and in other countries, how do they exchange their money when they go to and from countries? How is this exchange rate decided?

Just like the story of Mirza sir buying a wife for a donkey, China and USA are angry with each other right now. USA thinks China's money called Rimnimby or RMB is a bad. Chinese people are angry with USA shouting at them all the time. Find out what is ACTUALLY happening between USA and China, by asking a few adults. Note their responses. Ask other people. Remember their response. I will answer the question in next letter. We will compare notes.


A lesson I have learnt today: Google has a wonderful 'Check Spelling' function, which makes your wrong grammar and spelling appear underlined in red. Always check your spelling before you send it away!

Next time I will write to you about another interesting thing also. But if you have something going on in your mind, we can discuss this topic further. We have many years and each year has 52 weeks.

If I write only one letter a week, and I write for N years,

I can write 52 X N letters

Or simply 52N letters